New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[pytorch] Update docstring for FSDP.set_state_dict_type #103864
Conversation
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/103864
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ❗ 1 Merge Blocking SEVsThere is 1 active merge blocking SEVs. Please view them below:
If you must merge, use ✅ You can merge normally! (1 Unrelated Failure)As of commit 3afc55d with merge base a74f50d (): FLAKY - The following job failed but was likely due to flakiness present on trunk:
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D46670165 |
pls fix lint before landing |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#103864 I noticed optim_state_dict_config was missing from the Args section Test Plan: N/A Reviewed By: fegin, rohan-varma Differential Revision: D46670165 fbshipit-source-id: 696fa03463e6bdecdf3ed1c38a75d1713b392f88
83e6b2a
to
8ffbe98
Compare
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D46670165 |
Hi, how do I land this? |
@daniellepintz you can use pytorchbot to rebase and merge on Github first. Then the diff will be landed in a diff train which you don't need to worry about. |
@pytorchbot merge |
Merge startedYour change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours). Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
Merge failedReason: 1 mandatory check(s) failed. The first few are: Dig deeper by viewing the failures on hud |
@pytorchbot merge |
Merge startedYour change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours). Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
Merge failedReason: This PR is too stale; the last push date was more than 3 days ago. Please rebase and try again. You can rebase and merge by leaving the following comment on this PR: Details for Dev Infra teamRaised by workflow job |
@rohan-varma @fduwjj @fegin Could someone pls help me land this PR? |
@pytorchbot merge |
Merge failedReason: Not merging any PRs at the moment because there is a merge blocking https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/labels/ci:%20sev issue open at: Details for Dev Infra teamRaised by workflow job |
8ffbe98
to
b0427e1
Compare
Summary: I noticed optim_state_dict_config was missing from the Args section Test Plan: N/A Reviewed By: fegin, fduwjj, rohan-varma Differential Revision: D46670165
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D46670165 |
Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#103864 I noticed optim_state_dict_config was missing from the Args section Test Plan: N/A Reviewed By: fegin, fduwjj, rohan-varma Differential Revision: D46670165 fbshipit-source-id: 2efea7e382ba268df9b002eefc20ca0b9c700091
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D46670165 |
b0427e1
to
3afc55d
Compare
@pytorchbot merge |
Merge startedYour change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours). Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
Summary: I noticed optim_state_dict_config was missing from the Args section
Test Plan: N/A
Reviewed By: rohan-varma
Differential Revision: D46670165