Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

doc: fix fake quantize per channel doc #105955

Closed

Conversation

OrenLeung
Copy link
Contributor

@OrenLeung OrenLeung commented Jul 25, 2023

another doc bug for fake_quantize_per_channel

function doc now matches

Tensor fake_quantize_per_channel_affine(

cc: @jimwu6

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Jul 25, 2023

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/105955

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ 1 Unrelated Failure

As of commit 1324c70:

UNSTABLE - The following job failed but was likely due to flakiness present on trunk and has been marked as unstable:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the release notes: python_frontend release notes category label Jul 25, 2023
@OrenLeung
Copy link
Contributor Author

can i get a review? @kit1980

@OrenLeung OrenLeung force-pushed the fix-fake-quantize-per-channel-doc branch from 6cdfda7 to 1324c70 Compare July 25, 2023 19:05
@kit1980
Copy link
Member

kit1980 commented Jul 25, 2023

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Jul 25, 2023
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: Not merging any PRs at the moment because there is a merge blocking https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/labels/ci:%20sev issue open at:
#105964

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

@OrenLeung
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kit1980 may you restart the merge? seems that the ci SEV is over

@kit1980
Copy link
Member

kit1980 commented Jul 26, 2023

may you restart the merge? seems that the ci SEV is over

@OrenLeung FYI after the approval anyone can post the merge comment

@pytorch pytorch deleted a comment from pytorch-bot bot Jul 26, 2023
@kit1980
Copy link
Member

kit1980 commented Jul 26, 2023

@pytorchbot merge -i

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged while ignoring the following 1 checks: trunk / linux-focal-rocm5.6-py3.8 / test (default, 2, 3, linux.rocm.gpu, unstable)

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request Merged open source release notes: python_frontend release notes category
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants