New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
migrating deprecated calls without abc module for containers #11515
Conversation
The reason why we used those is that |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
jeffreyksmithjr has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
jeffreyksmithjr has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.
0704613
to
b33b594
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
jeffreyksmithjr has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.
b33b594
to
b237ef7
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
jeffreyksmithjr has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.
b237ef7
to
02bc339
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
jeffreyksmithjr has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.
@pytorchbot retest this please |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! Thanks!
@pytorchbot retest this please |
The Circle tests all flaked (but I think that's a more global issue). The ROCM tests failed, which is also a known issue. With @ssnl 's LGTM do we call this mergeable or are we going to try to get any of those failed builds to pass? |
@jeffreyksmithjr one of the builds has been broken for at least a day, another one has timed out, but it's unlikely that it failed. CircleCI is experimental, so you can ignore any failures for now. Go ahead and merge this |
(Although it might be good to get a review of the C2 bits from someone working on C2) |
Makes sense. There is some tiny amount of Caffe2 impact. Could any Caffe2 experts review this PR? |
02bc339
to
e18207f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
jeffreyksmithjr has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks great - are we planning to unify _six and six?
@Yangqing If we do, it could be as simple as |
Paraphrasing what @apaszke told me, the reason for Clearly, the current approach does create a bit of obvious redundancy, though. |
e18207f
to
79e7409
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
jeffreyksmithjr has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.
79e7409
to
abdf04b
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
jeffreyksmithjr has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
jeffreyksmithjr is landing this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
jeffreyksmithjr is landing this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.
Implementing #10540.