Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[export] Remove CallSpec #117671

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

angelayi
Copy link
Contributor

Summary: This is not really being used anywhere

Test Plan: CI

Differential Revision: D52842563

Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Jan 17, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/117671

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 9a7d73d with merge base 6fe5a3a (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D52842563

angelayi added a commit to angelayi/executorch-1 that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2024
Summary:
X-link: pytorch/pytorch#117671


This is not really being used anywhere

Differential Revision: D52842563
angelayi added a commit to angelayi/pytorch that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2024
Summary:

X-link: pytorch/executorch#1618

This is not really being used anywhere

Test Plan: CI

Differential Revision: D52842563
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D52842563

angelayi added a commit to angelayi/executorch-1 that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2024
Summary:
X-link: pytorch/pytorch#117671


This is not really being used anywhere

Differential Revision: D52842563
angelayi added a commit to angelayi/pytorch that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2024
Summary:

X-link: pytorch/executorch#1618

This is not really being used anywhere

Test Plan: CI

Differential Revision: D52842563
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D52842563

Copy link
Contributor

@avikchaudhuri avikchaudhuri left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice.

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Jan 17, 2024
angelayi added a commit to angelayi/executorch-1 that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2024
Summary:
X-link: pytorch/pytorch#117671


This is not really being used anywhere

Differential Revision: D52842563
angelayi added a commit to angelayi/pytorch that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2024
Summary:

X-link: pytorch/executorch#1618

This is not really being used anywhere

Test Plan: CI

Differential Revision: D52842563
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D52842563

angelayi added a commit to angelayi/executorch-1 that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2024
Summary:
X-link: pytorch/pytorch#117671


This is not really being used anywhere

Reviewed By: zhxchen17

Differential Revision: D52842563
angelayi added a commit to angelayi/pytorch that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2024
Summary:

X-link: pytorch/executorch#1618

This is not really being used anywhere

Test Plan: CI

Reviewed By: zhxchen17

Differential Revision: D52842563
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D52842563

angelayi added a commit to angelayi/pytorch that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2024
Summary:

X-link: pytorch/executorch#1618

This is not really being used anywhere

Test Plan: CI

Reviewed By: zhxchen17

Differential Revision: D52842563
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D52842563

angelayi added a commit to angelayi/executorch-1 that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2024
Summary:
X-link: pytorch/pytorch#117671


This is not really being used anywhere

Reviewed By: zhxchen17

Differential Revision: D52842563
angelayi added a commit to angelayi/executorch-1 that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2024
Summary:
X-link: pytorch/pytorch#117671


This is not really being used anywhere

Reviewed By: zhxchen17

Differential Revision: D52842563
angelayi added a commit to angelayi/pytorch that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2024
Summary:

X-link: pytorch/executorch#1618

This is not really being used anywhere

Test Plan: CI

Reviewed By: zhxchen17

Differential Revision: D52842563
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D52842563

@zhxchen17
Copy link
Contributor

@angelayi still going?

Summary:

X-link: pytorch/executorch#1618

This is not really being used anywhere

Test Plan: CI

Reviewed By: zhxchen17

Differential Revision: D52842563
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D52842563

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -f 'Landed internally'

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, using force because this PR might not pass merge_rules.json but landed internally)

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use -f as last resort and instead consider -i/--ignore-current to continue the merge ignoring current failures. This will allow currently pending tests to finish and report signal before the merge.

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

pytorch-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 8, 2024
Summary: This is not really being used anywhere

Test Plan: CI

Differential Revision: D52842563

Pull Request resolved: #117671
Approved by: https://github.com/avikchaudhuri, https://github.com/zhxchen17
clee2000 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2024
Summary: This is not really being used anywhere

Test Plan: CI

Differential Revision: D52842563

Pull Request resolved: #117671
Approved by: https://github.com/avikchaudhuri, https://github.com/zhxchen17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ciflow/inductor ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request fb-exported Merged
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants