Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for labels to ttir analysis #119836

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Feb 13, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/119836

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit ed6bd38 with merge base 28f299a (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx chenyang78 aakhundov kadeng

[ghstack-poisoned]
Comment on lines +1236 to +1237
if pid > 1:
return
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we add another test where we do different things in if and else blocks with a data-dependent condition like this?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I already have a test for that which turns into a scf.if not labels

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Interesting, so labels are only used on if ...: return? or also if can have a body and this is still generated as label?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Depends on what happens in the body, is it dynamic or not

cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx chenyang78 aakhundov kadeng

[ghstack-poisoned]
pytorchmergebot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2024
pytorchmergebot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the gh/oulgen/46/head branch March 16, 2024 01:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants