Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[AOTI] Disable stack allocation for OSS #125732

Closed
wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

desertfire
Copy link
Contributor

@desertfire desertfire commented May 8, 2024

Summary: Stack allocation is for certain small CPU models, but its coverage still needs improvement, so default to OFF for OSS.

[ghstack-poisoned]
@desertfire desertfire requested a review from a team as a code owner May 8, 2024 01:11
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented May 8, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/125732

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ You can merge normally! (1 Unrelated Failure)

As of commit 788e458 with merge base b40fb2d (image):

UNSTABLE - The following job failed but was likely due to flakiness present on trunk and has been marked as unstable:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

Summary: Stack allocation is for certain small CPU models, but its coverage still needs improvement, so default to OFF for OSS.

[ghstack-poisoned]
desertfire added a commit that referenced this pull request May 9, 2024
Summary: Stack allocation is for certain small CPU models, but its coverage still needs improvement, so default to OFF for OSS.

ghstack-source-id: 51693eb90ba97406a0e35689809196ffc8a73768
Pull Request resolved: #125732
@desertfire desertfire added the topic: not user facing topic category label May 9, 2024
Summary: Stack allocation is for certain small CPU models, but its coverage still needs improvement, so default to OFF for OSS.

cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx peterbell10 ipiszy yf225 chenyang78 kadeng muchulee8 ColinPeppler amjames chauhang

[ghstack-poisoned]
Summary: Stack allocation is for certain small CPU models, but its coverage still needs improvement, so default to OFF for OSS.

cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx peterbell10 ipiszy yf225 chenyang78 kadeng muchulee8 ColinPeppler amjames chauhang

[ghstack-poisoned]
Summary: Stack allocation is for certain small CPU models, but its coverage still needs improvement, so default to OFF for OSS.

cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx peterbell10 ipiszy yf225 chenyang78 kadeng muchulee8 ColinPeppler amjames chauhang

[ghstack-poisoned]
Summary: Stack allocation is for certain small CPU models, but its coverage still needs improvement, so default to OFF for OSS.

cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx peterbell10 ipiszy yf225 chenyang78 kadeng muchulee8 ColinPeppler amjames chauhang

[ghstack-poisoned]
@desertfire
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label May 22, 2024
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

pytorchmergebot added a commit that referenced this pull request May 24, 2024
This reverts commit 599e684.

Reverted #125732 on behalf of https://github.com/DanilBaibak due to Break internal build ([comment](#126720 (comment)))
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@desertfire your PR has been successfully reverted.

Summary: Stack allocation is for certain small CPU models, but its coverage still needs improvement, so default to OFF for OSS.

cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx peterbell10 ipiszy yf225 chenyang78 kadeng muchulee8 ColinPeppler amjames chauhang

[ghstack-poisoned]
desertfire added a commit that referenced this pull request May 24, 2024
Summary: Stack allocation is for certain small CPU models, but its coverage still needs improvement, so default to OFF for OSS.

ghstack-source-id: c0c6ccbdb50ecd5c0dfea4f1573c81b433862af5
Pull Request resolved: #125732
@desertfire
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

titaiwangms pushed a commit to titaiwangms/pytorch that referenced this pull request May 28, 2024
titaiwangms pushed a commit to titaiwangms/pytorch that referenced this pull request May 28, 2024
Summary: Stack allocation is for certain small CPU models, but its coverage still needs improvement, so default to OFF for OSS.

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#125732
Approved by: https://github.com/chenyang78
ghstack dependencies: pytorch#126720, pytorch#126801
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the gh/desertfire/379/head branch June 25, 2024 01:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants