Correct Categorical docstring
#45804
Conversation
Clarified that the `Categorical` distribution will actually accept input of any arbitrary tensor shape, not just 1D and 2D tensors.
|
First discovered this when trying to implement an ordered categorical distribution for |
|
seems like one of the builds is failing... not sure why, the only thing I changed was the docstring! CircleCI says there is a failed test that says |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@VitalyFedyunin has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.
|
@VitalyFedyunin merged this pull request in e4efc42. |
|
@VitalyFedyunin I just realized I have enough commits this month to actually participate in hacktoberfest; would you consider marking this PR as |
|
@mruberry I think the tag has to be literally |
Not at all, @ecotner, but we don't appear to have a "hacktoberfest-accepted" label, sorry. The addition of the Merged label was just a program adding labels for some stats we're generating. |
|
Would it be too much to ask if you might be able to add a new label? It looks like there are already over 200 labels in this repo, some of which have never even been used before! |
Clarified that the
Categoricaldistribution will actually accept input of any arbitrary tensor shape, not just 1D and 2D tensors.