Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[cmake] clean up blas discovery #47940

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

walterddr
Copy link
Contributor

remove useless variable changes in blas discovery

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 14, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #47940 (f2ee3ba) into master (bdf360f) will increase coverage by 0.12%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #47940      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   80.91%   81.04%   +0.12%     
==========================================
  Files        1855     1842      -13     
  Lines      200241   199238    -1003     
==========================================
- Hits       162023   161467     -556     
+ Misses      38218    37771     -447     

@dr-ci
Copy link

dr-ci bot commented Nov 16, 2020

💊 CI failures summary and remediations

As of commit 35282c3 (more details on the Dr. CI page):


💚 💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚 💚


This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).Follow this link to opt-out of these comments for your Pull Requests.

Please report bugs/suggestions on the GitHub issue tracker or post in the (internal) Dr. CI Users group.

See how this bot performed.

This comment has been revised 10 times.

@walterddr walterddr marked this pull request as ready for review November 20, 2020 15:00
Copy link
Contributor

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@walterddr has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@walterddr walterddr requested a review from a team November 20, 2020 20:25
Copy link
Contributor

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@walterddr has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

Copy link
Contributor

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@walterddr has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@walterddr merged this pull request in af520d9.

malfet added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 3, 2021
Fix accidental regression introduced by #47940

`FIND_PACKAGE(OpenBLAS)` does not validate that discovered library can actually be used, while `check_fortran_libraries` does that

Test Plan: Build PyTorch with static OpenBLAS and check that `torch.svd(torch.ones(3, 3)).S` do not raise an exception
@malfet malfet mentioned this pull request Mar 3, 2021
facebook-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 3, 2021
Summary:
Fix accidental regression introduced by #47940

`FIND_PACKAGE(OpenBLAS)` does not validate that discovered library can actually be used, while `check_fortran_libraries` does that

Pull Request resolved: #53168

Test Plan: Build PyTorch with static OpenBLAS and check that `torch.svd(torch.ones(3, 3)).S` do not raise an exception

Reviewed By: walterddr

Differential Revision: D26772345

Pulled By: malfet

fbshipit-source-id: 3e4675c176b30dfe4f0490d7d3dfe4f9a4037134
aocsa pushed a commit to Quansight/pytorch that referenced this pull request Mar 15, 2021
Summary:
Fix accidental regression introduced by pytorch#47940

`FIND_PACKAGE(OpenBLAS)` does not validate that discovered library can actually be used, while `check_fortran_libraries` does that

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#53168

Test Plan: Build PyTorch with static OpenBLAS and check that `torch.svd(torch.ones(3, 3)).S` do not raise an exception

Reviewed By: walterddr

Differential Revision: D26772345

Pulled By: malfet

fbshipit-source-id: 3e4675c176b30dfe4f0490d7d3dfe4f9a4037134
xsacha pushed a commit to xsacha/pytorch that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2021
Summary:
Fix accidental regression introduced by pytorch#47940

`FIND_PACKAGE(OpenBLAS)` does not validate that discovered library can actually be used, while `check_fortran_libraries` does that

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#53168

Test Plan: Build PyTorch with static OpenBLAS and check that `torch.svd(torch.ones(3, 3)).S` do not raise an exception

Reviewed By: walterddr

Differential Revision: D26772345

Pulled By: malfet

fbshipit-source-id: 3e4675c176b30dfe4f0490d7d3dfe4f9a4037134
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants