Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Qnnpack Fully Connected Sparse Op to Store Variable Size Indices #85243

Closed
wants to merge 8 commits into from

Conversation

Only uint32_t is supported for now, but uint16_t and uint8_t support will be added in future diffs.

Differential Revision: [D38828545](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D38828545/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Sep 19, 2022

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/85243

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit c61b975:
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

… Size Indices"

Only uint32_t is supported for now, but uint16_t and uint8_t support will be added in future diffs.

Differential Revision: [D38828545](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D38828545/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
… Size Indices"

Only uint32_t is supported for now, but uint16_t and uint8_t support will be added in future diffs.

Differential Revision: [D38828545](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D38828545/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
… Size Indices"

Only uint32_t is supported for now, but uint16_t and uint8_t support will be added in future diffs.

Differential Revision: [D38828545](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D38828545/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
… Size Indices"

Only uint32_t is supported for now, but uint16_t and uint8_t support will be added in future diffs.

Differential Revision: [D38828545](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D38828545/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
@linux-foundation-easycla
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Oct 3, 2022

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

1 similar comment
@linux-foundation-easycla
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Oct 3, 2022

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

… Size Indices"

Only uint32_t is supported for now, but uint16_t and uint8_t support will be added in future diffs.

Differential Revision: [D38828545](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D38828545/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/easycla

As part of the transition to the PyTorch Foundation, this project now requires contributions be covered under the new CLA. See #85559 for additional details.

This comment will trigger a new check of this PR. If you are already covered, you will simply see a new "EasyCLA" check that passes. If you are not covered, a bot will leave a new comment with a link to sign.

… Size Indices"

Only uint32_t is supported for now, but uint16_t and uint8_t support will be added in future diffs.

Differential Revision: [D38828545](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D38828545/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
… Size Indices"

Only uint32_t is supported for now, but uint16_t and uint8_t support will be added in future diffs.

Differential Revision: [D38828545](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D38828545/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged)

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@github-actions
Copy link

Hey @salilsdesai.
You've committed this PR, but it does not have both a 'release notes: ...' and 'topics: ...' label. Please add one of each to the PR. The 'release notes: ...' label should represent the part of PyTorch that this PR changes (fx, autograd, distributed, etc) and the 'topics: ...' label should represent the kind of PR it is (not user facing, new feature, bug fix, perf improvement, etc). The list of valid labels can be found here for the 'release notes: ...' and here for the 'topics: ...'.
For changes that are 'topic: not user facing' there is no need for a release notes label.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/salilsdesai/1/head branch June 8, 2023 18:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants