-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix some composite compliance ops for functionalization #86470
Conversation
[ghstack-poisoned]
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/86470
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ❌ 1 FailuresAs of commit 5ef1cbc: This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
Confirmed that this fixes #86384 cc tugsbayasgalan Functionalization should be included in the "isSubclass" checks that we run, for composite operators that have a different path for composite compliance. [ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorchbot merge -f "flaky windows cpu build out of resources" |
Merge startedYour change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
Hey @bdhirsh. |
) Summary: Confirmed that this fixes #86384 cc tugsbayasgalan Functionalization should be included in the "isSubclass" checks that we run, for composite operators that have a different path for composite compliance. Pull Request resolved: #86470 Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang, https://github.com/zou3519 Test Plan: contbuild & OSS CI, see https://hud.pytorch.org/commit/pytorch/pytorch/4a5fdc56ec692fe5e39b8f5d2da6be16434c5a02 Reviewed By: DanilBaibak Differential Revision: D40232582 Pulled By: DanilBaibak fbshipit-source-id: 27eab2aa778c4121a3db1f374bc0e63633e9bfd9
ghstack-source-id: 09dd37c15c3c3d10cae779fa5eb48c6284d7f44c Pull Request resolved: pytorch/pytorch#86470
Confirmed that this fixes #86384
cc @tugsbayasgalan
Functionalization should be included in the "isSubclass" checks that we run, for composite operators that have a different path for composite compliance.
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):