Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[xnnpack][lite-int][on-device] rebuild serialized modules at runtime #88780

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

mcr229
Copy link
Contributor

@mcr229 mcr229 commented Nov 9, 2022

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

This is the on-device runtime work. We modify the compile and execute from our hacky solution from before to what will actually be running at runtime.

First we rebuild our graph from the serialized flatbuffer string. We also introduce a runtime wrapper that inherits CustomClassHolder that allows us to forward along the built xnngraph runtime to our execute function

Once the subgraph object has been rebuilt by our we pass it along to the runtime wrapper for us to forward along to execute

At execute we prep the input/outputs and invoke the runtime using our runtime wrapper. Finally we forward those results to our execution

Differential Revision: D39413031

NOTE FOR REVIEWERS: This PR has internal Meta-specific changes or comments, please review them on Phabricator!

This is the on-device runtime work. We modify the compile and execute from our hacky solution from before to what will actually be running at runtime.

First we rebuild our graph from the serialized flatbuffer string. We also introduce a runtime wrapper that inherits CustomClassHolder that allows us to forward along the built xnngraph runtime to our execute function

Once the subgraph object has been rebuilt by our we pass it along to the runtime wrapper for us to forward along to execute

At execute we prep the input/outputs and invoke the runtime using our runtime wrapper. Finally we forward those results to our execution

Differential Revision: [D39413031](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D39413031/)

**NOTE FOR REVIEWERS**: This PR has internal Meta-specific changes or comments, please review them on [Phabricator](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D39413031/)!

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the release notes: jit release notes category label Nov 9, 2022
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Nov 9, 2022

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/88780

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 367ac85:
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

mcr229 added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2022
This is the on-device runtime work. We modify the compile and execute from our hacky solution from before to what will actually be running at runtime.

First we rebuild our graph from the serialized flatbuffer string. We also introduce a runtime wrapper that inherits CustomClassHolder that allows us to forward along the built xnngraph runtime to our execute function

Once the subgraph object has been rebuilt by our we pass it along to the runtime wrapper for us to forward along to execute

At execute we prep the input/outputs and invoke the runtime using our runtime wrapper. Finally we forward those results to our execution

Differential Revision: [D39413031](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D39413031/)

**NOTE FOR REVIEWERS**: This PR has internal Meta-specific changes or comments, please review them on [Phabricator](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D39413031/)!

ghstack-source-id: 173215762
Pull Request resolved: #88780
Copy link
Contributor

@digantdesai digantdesai left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged)

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Nov 10, 2022
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged)

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

kulinseth pushed a commit to kulinseth/pytorch that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2022
…ytorch#88780)

This is the on-device runtime work. We modify the compile and execute from our hacky solution from before to what will actually be running at runtime.

First we rebuild our graph from the serialized flatbuffer string. We also introduce a runtime wrapper that inherits CustomClassHolder that allows us to forward along the built xnngraph runtime to our execute function

Once the subgraph object has been rebuilt by our we pass it along to the runtime wrapper for us to forward along to execute

At execute we prep the input/outputs and invoke the runtime using our runtime wrapper. Finally we forward those results to our execution

Differential Revision: [D39413031](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D39413031/)

**NOTE FOR REVIEWERS**: This PR has internal Meta-specific changes or comments, please review them on [Phabricator](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D39413031/)!
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#88780
Approved by: https://github.com/digantdesai
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/mcr229/20/head branch June 8, 2023 17:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request Merged release notes: jit release notes category
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants