-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add generator argument to torch.rand docstring #90071
Conversation
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/90071
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ✅ No FailuresAs of commit 6488647: This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
@pytorchbot merge |
Merge startedYour change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours). Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
@pytorchbot merge -f "Doc generation only change, lint passed" |
The merge job was canceled. If you believe this is a mistake,then you can re trigger it through pytorch-bot. |
Merge startedYour change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
The documentation of `torch.rand` was missing the `generator` keyword argument in the function signature. However, the argument is explained in the documentation and `torch.rand` accepts that argument. Pull Request resolved: pytorch#90071 Approved by: https://github.com/janeyx99
The documentation of
torch.rand
was missing thegenerator
keyword argument in the function signature. However, the argument is explained in the documentation andtorch.rand
accepts that argument.cc @svekars @carljparker