Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make segment_reduce properly private. #93166

Closed
wants to merge 10 commits into from

Conversation

albanD
Copy link
Collaborator

@albanD albanD commented Jan 27, 2023

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Jan 27, 2023

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/93166

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 2 Failures

As of commit c759027:

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

BROKEN TRUNK - The following jobs failed but were present on the merge base 438f12d:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@albanD albanD force-pushed the hide_segment_reduce branch 2 times, most recently from 3a6fdd8 to 66b1b2e Compare January 30, 2023 18:50
@ezyang
Copy link
Contributor

ezyang commented Feb 1, 2023

fix pr title plz

@albanD albanD changed the title First draft Make segment_reduce properly private. Feb 1, 2023
@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the release notes: fx release notes category label Feb 1, 2023
@albanD
Copy link
Collaborator Author

albanD commented Feb 1, 2023

I can't reproduce the lint error locally. Also all other use of torch._segment_reduce don't raise mypy issues. So I'm silencing it for now,.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@albanD has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@albanD has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@albanD has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@albanD albanD added the module: bc-breaking Related to a BC-breaking change label Feb 6, 2023
@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the topic: bc breaking topic category label Feb 6, 2023
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -f 'Landed internally'

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, using force because this PR might not pass merge_rules.json but landed internally)

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Merged module: bc-breaking Related to a BC-breaking change module: inductor release notes: fx release notes category topic: bc breaking topic category
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants