Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Run the benchmark suite with dynamic batch only #97912

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

ezyang
Copy link
Contributor

@ezyang ezyang commented Mar 29, 2023

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

Symbolic shapes compile time on full CI with inductor is horribly long (even though our aot_eager local runs seemed to suggest that the added latency was only 10s per model.) To patch over the problem for now, run the benchmark suite with dynamic batch only. This should absolve a lot of sins.

Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang ezyang@meta.com

cc @soumith @voznesenskym @penguinwu @anijain2305 @EikanWang @jgong5 @Guobing-Chen @XiaobingSuper @zhuhaozhe @blzheng @Xia-Weiwen @wenzhe-nrv @jiayisunx @desertfire

Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@meta.com>

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Mar 29, 2023

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/97912

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 12c6bbb:
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the release notes: fx release notes category label Mar 29, 2023
ezyang added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 29, 2023
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyangmeta.com>

ghstack-source-id: a677239b814e58cf9f6d95db5de24487bcf58f3a
Pull Request resolved: #97912
@albanD albanD removed their request for review March 29, 2023 23:44
@ezyang ezyang requested a review from BowenBao March 30, 2023 13:06
Symbolic shapes compile time on full CI with inductor is horribly long (even though our aot_eager local runs seemed to suggest that the added latency was only 10s per model.) To patch over the problem for now, run the benchmark suite with dynamic batch only.  This should absolve a lot of sins.

Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyangmeta.com>

cc soumith voznesenskym penguinwu anijain2305 EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng Xia-Weiwen wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx desertfire

[ghstack-poisoned]
@ezyang
Copy link
Contributor Author

ezyang commented Mar 30, 2023

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Mar 30, 2023
ezyang added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 30, 2023
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyangmeta.com>

ghstack-source-id: e5bb4413bc0ce07f6a30d8bc86cba916dab4d794
Pull Request resolved: #97912
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: 1 jobs have failed, first few of them are: inductor / cuda11.8-py3.10-gcc7-sm80 / test (inductor_torchbench_smoketest_perf, 1, 1, linux.gcp.a100)

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

Symbolic shapes compile time on full CI with inductor is horribly long (even though our aot_eager local runs seemed to suggest that the added latency was only 10s per model.) To patch over the problem for now, run the benchmark suite with dynamic batch only.  This should absolve a lot of sins.

Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyangmeta.com>

cc soumith voznesenskym penguinwu anijain2305 EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng Xia-Weiwen wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx desertfire

[ghstack-poisoned]
ezyang added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 30, 2023
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyangmeta.com>

ghstack-source-id: bc9a701b397fab7f8d52e77a9d421ef35ad5558e
Pull Request resolved: #97912
@ezyang
Copy link
Contributor Author

ezyang commented Mar 30, 2023

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/ezyang/1944/head branch June 8, 2023 16:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ciflow/inductor ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request Merged module: dynamo release notes: fx release notes category
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants