New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Doc] linalg.ldl_factor: render the Shape of tensor A #99777
Conversation
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/99777
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ✅ 1 Unrelated FailureAs of commit 90a1625: UNSTABLE - The following job failed but was likely due to flakiness present on trunk and has been marked as unstable:
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D45204660 |
1 similar comment
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D45204660 |
6f89712
to
38a7a57
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please, see the format that's used in the rest of linalg. In particular, we avoid using :math:
as it takes quite a long time to render. Use single backticks instead.
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D45204660 |
38a7a57
to
60cf73d
Compare
Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#99777 Differential Revision: D45204660 fbshipit-source-id: 58006c20691e10733714b98a4b62e3c40482f46c
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D45204660 |
60cf73d
to
c258c84
Compare
Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#99777 Differential Revision: D45204660 fbshipit-source-id: 74feb22215b595e1599d5fdfebfbf84a76acdaec
c258c84
to
cfe8191
Compare
Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#99777 Differential Revision: D45204660 fbshipit-source-id: 92789ab16ebea78ef0385db2020e4fd2a8bfda0c
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D45204660 |
torch/linalg/__init__.py
Outdated
@@ -871,7 +871,8 @@ | |||
""" + r""" | |||
|
|||
Args: | |||
A (Tensor): tensor of shape (*, n, n) where * is zero or more batch dimensions consisting of symmetric or Hermitian matrices. | |||
A (Tensor): tensor of shape `(*, n, n)` where `*` is zero or more batch dimensions | |||
consisting of symmetric or Hermitian matrices. | |||
`(*, n, n)` where `*` is one or more batch dimensions. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Feel free to delete this line as well, as it's repeated. Same in the other function.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also, this line has extra indentation. Same in the other one
cfe8191
to
c0a4882
Compare
Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#99777 Differential Revision: D45204660 fbshipit-source-id: a6e842c166a9b8d95e5f1d777ddd27654a35869b
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D45204660 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you!
Looks like this PR hasn't been updated in a while so we're going to go ahead and mark this as |
@lezcano @IvanYashchuk any plans to merge this? :) |
You can merge it yourself writing |
@pytorchbot merge |
@pytorchbot merge -r |
@pytorchbot started a rebase job onto refs/remotes/origin/viable/strict. Check the current status here |
Successfully rebased |
Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#99777 Differential Revision: D45204660 fbshipit-source-id: a6e842c166a9b8d95e5f1d777ddd27654a35869b
c0a4882
to
192a6db
Compare
Merge failedReason: This PR has internal changes and must be landed via Phabricator Details for Dev Infra teamRaised by workflow job |
@pytorchbot merge -r |
@pytorchbot started a rebase job onto refs/remotes/origin/viable/strict. Check the current status here |
Merge startedYour change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours). Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
Merge failedReason: 1 jobs have failed, first few of them are: Meta Internal-Only Changes Check Details for Dev Infra teamRaised by workflow job |
@pytorchbot merge -f |
❌ 🤖 pytorchbot command failed:
Try |
@pytorchbot merge -f "test failure unrelated" |
You are not authorized to force merges to this repository. Please use the regular |
Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#99777 Differential Revision: D45204660 fbshipit-source-id: c797c01364df96b0b71073244527f45c8ddba3ea
192a6db
to
90a1625
Compare
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D45204660 |
Since you imported this, you should import the rebased branch onto phabricator as well, I believe. |
@pytorchbot merge |
Merge startedYour change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours). Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
Summary: Fix: #96864
Test Plan: Please see GitHub tests.