Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add tests for negative samples for Mask R-CNN and Keypoint R-CNN #2069

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Apr 7, 2020

Conversation

fmassa
Copy link
Member

@fmassa fmassa commented Apr 7, 2020

Follow-up of #1911 adding tests for Mask R-CNN and Keypoint R-CNN

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Apr 7, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #2069 into master will not change coverage by %.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #2069   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage    0.48%   0.48%           
======================================
  Files          92      92           
  Lines        7413    7413           
  Branches     1128    1128           
======================================
  Hits           36      36           
  Misses       7364    7364           
  Partials       13      13           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
torchvision/ops/misc.py 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 74679cc...c093fae. Read the comment docs.

@fmassa fmassa merged commit 51d694e into pytorch:master Apr 7, 2020
@fmassa fmassa deleted the mrcnn-empty-tests branch April 7, 2020 12:34
fmassa added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2020
* Add tests for negative samples for Mask R-CNN and Keypoint R-CNN

* Fix lint
fmassa added a commit to fmassa/vision-1 that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2020
…orch#2069)

* Add tests for negative samples for Mask R-CNN and Keypoint R-CNN

* Fix lint
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants