New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for modis l2 geolocation interpolation #15
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -63,6 +63,16 @@ def test_modis(self): | |
self.assertTrue(np.allclose(lon1, lons, atol=1e-2)) | ||
self.assertTrue(np.allclose(lat1, lats, atol=1e-2)) | ||
|
||
# Test level 2 | ||
lat5 = lat1[2::5, 2:-5:5] | ||
lon5 = lon1[2::5, 2:-5:5] | ||
|
||
satz5 = satz1[2::5, 2:-5:5] | ||
lons, lats = modis_5km_to_1km(lon5, lat5, satz5) | ||
self.assertTrue(np.allclose(lon1, lons, atol=1e-2)) | ||
self.assertTrue(np.allclose(lat1, lats, atol=1e-2)) | ||
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Test also passes with a random MOD35_L2 file picked on LAADS archive. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Perfect ! |
||
|
||
def suite(): | ||
"""The suite for MODIS""" | ||
loader = unittest.TestLoader() | ||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would it be more explanatory to introduce an optional
product_level
argument? Thecscan_full_width
will be then fixed according to its value.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe. Although I think @BENR0 reported that it could also be 269 pixels in some cases, so maybe providing the actual number of pixels is to be prefered ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Plus it doesn't require to pass an extra argument to
modis_5km_to_1km
since the size is deduced from longitude argument. Let's keep it hence as you've suggested.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes I think it is better to use the cscan_full_width instead of the level argument due to what @mraspaud said. Also this can possibly directly be used in the readers then because the scan width, as far as I remember for the mod35_l2 product, is in the attributes.