Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

What pyviz packages should there be? #86

Closed
ceball opened this issue Jul 23, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

What pyviz packages should there be? #86

ceball opened this issue Jul 23, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@ceball
Copy link
Member

ceball commented Jul 23, 2018

(I thought I already created this issue, but apparently not. If I missed a duplicate issue, or we discussed this elsewhere and I've forgotten to import the discussion here, please close or edit this issue...)

Currently we have one pyviz package, with dependencies for all the topics. We don't yet list topics, but will soon. At that point, should we have multiple packages (i.e. options), with each corresponding to a topic?

Also: we currently produce only a highly pinned conda package. That's ok, because pyviz isn't a library that's designed to be integrated into someone else's package (that's what the libraries underling pyviz are for). But a highly pinned conda package can be difficult to install, except in a dedicated environment. By which point, a "conda env create (some file env file on anaconda.org or maybe github)" command might make more sense...?

@jsignell
Copy link
Member

jsignell commented Jan 9, 2019

It could be nice to have each topic notebook have it's own mini env that would depend on pyviz core but add any additional packages and could be used with conda env update -f <topic-env-file>

@jsignell
Copy link
Member

jsignell commented Jul 9, 2019

I think we have resolved this somewhat by saying holoviz is a highly pinned set of packages that are guaranteed to work together, but not guaranteed to be up to date. Then there is pyviz-topics/examples which uses the anaconda-project approach.

@jsignell jsignell closed this as completed Jul 9, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants