Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding support for beam precession #137
Adding support for beam precession #137
Changes from 3 commits
876aed2
9735db8
c957383
9e37d33
10f2390
f4d61c4
598a95e
d24eb78
ea7cb65
301963a
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would it be better if this were relative to the most intense spot? I'm not actually sure personally, but it's tricky to know how to set this without units... Probably it's fine as is.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
before it was just hard-coded as 1e-20 inside the function, I figured it might as well be a parameter. I guess some absolute value cut-off is most fair across different diffraction patterns in the library, resembling a kind of detection limit of a detector. On the other hand I guess different phases would require different cut-offs. Is this logic correct?