Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve support for WebFlux RouterFunction #4

Open
neiser opened this issue Nov 30, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Improve support for WebFlux RouterFunction #4

neiser opened this issue Nov 30, 2020 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@neiser
Copy link
Collaborator

neiser commented Nov 30, 2020

Open points:

  • The RouterFunctionAnalysis does not handle nesting of router functions, also the integration test App27 only tests very simple router function definitions.

  • The competition library springdoc-open-api has the idea of providing some helper predicates to support router functions better. A first attempt has been NamedHeaderPredicate in this library. Investigate this option closer.

  • Improve support for Content-Type and Accept header based content negotiation as we do for WebMVC handler methods

  • Improve finding the response code of a router function, see RouterFunctionHandlerMethodMapper.ResponseMapper

neiser added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 30, 2020
@neiser neiser added the enhancement New feature or request label May 29, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant