Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
ppc: Fix the range check in the LSWI instruction
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
There are two issues: First, the number of registers that are used has
to be calculated with "(nb + 3) / 4" (i.e. round always up, not down).
Second, the "start <= ra && (start + nr - 32) > ra" condition for the
wrap-around case is wrong: It has to be tested with "||" instead of "&&".
Since we can reuse this check later for the LSWX instruction, let's
place the fixed code into a helper function, too.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
  • Loading branch information
huth authored and dgibson committed Apr 18, 2016
1 parent c7b45f1 commit afbee71
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 12 additions and 4 deletions.
10 changes: 10 additions & 0 deletions target-ppc/cpu.h
Expand Up @@ -2415,6 +2415,16 @@ static inline bool msr_is_64bit(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong msr)
return msr & (1ULL << MSR_SF);
}

/**
* Check whether register rx is in the range between start and
* start + nregs (as needed by the LSWX and LSWI instructions)
*/
static inline bool lsw_reg_in_range(int start, int nregs, int rx)
{
return (start + nregs <= 32 && rx >= start && rx < start + nregs) ||
(start + nregs > 32 && (rx >= start || rx < start + nregs - 32));
}

extern void (*cpu_ppc_hypercall)(PowerPCCPU *);

#include "exec/exec-all.h"
Expand Down
6 changes: 2 additions & 4 deletions target-ppc/translate.c
Expand Up @@ -3227,10 +3227,8 @@ static void gen_lswi(DisasContext *ctx)

if (nb == 0)
nb = 32;
nr = nb / 4;
if (unlikely(((start + nr) > 32 &&
start <= ra && (start + nr - 32) > ra) ||
((start + nr) <= 32 && start <= ra && (start + nr) > ra))) {
nr = (nb + 3) / 4;
if (unlikely(lsw_reg_in_range(start, nr, ra))) {
gen_inval_exception(ctx, POWERPC_EXCP_INVAL_LSWX);
return;
}
Expand Down

0 comments on commit afbee71

Please sign in to comment.