Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
qtest/numa-test: Correct CPU and NUMA association in aarch64_numa_cpu()
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
In aarch64_numa_cpu(), the CPU and NUMA association is something
like below. Two threads in the same core/cluster/socket are
associated with two individual NUMA nodes, which is unreal as
Igor Mammedov mentioned. We don't expect the association to break
NUMA-to-socket boundary, which matches with the real world.

    NUMA-node  socket  cluster   core   thread
    ------------------------------------------
        0       0        0        0      0
        1       0        0        0      1

This corrects the topology for CPUs and their association with
NUMA nodes. After this patch is applied, the CPU and NUMA
association becomes something like below, which looks real.
Besides, socket/cluster/core/thread IDs are all checked when
the NUMA node IDs are verified. It helps to check if the CPU
topology is properly populated or not.

    NUMA-node  socket  cluster   core   thread
    ------------------------------------------
       0        1        0        0       0
       1        0        0        0       0

Suggested-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20220503140304.855514-5-gshan@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
  • Loading branch information
Gavin Shan authored and pm215 committed May 9, 2022
1 parent c9ec4cb commit e280ecb
Showing 1 changed file with 12 additions and 6 deletions.
18 changes: 12 additions & 6 deletions tests/qtest/numa-test.c
Expand Up @@ -224,30 +224,36 @@ static void aarch64_numa_cpu(const void *data)
g_autofree char *cli = NULL;

cli = make_cli(data, "-machine "
"smp.cpus=2,smp.sockets=1,smp.clusters=1,smp.cores=1,smp.threads=2 "
"smp.cpus=2,smp.sockets=2,smp.clusters=1,smp.cores=1,smp.threads=1 "
"-numa node,nodeid=0,memdev=ram -numa node,nodeid=1 "
"-numa cpu,node-id=1,thread-id=0 "
"-numa cpu,node-id=0,thread-id=1");
"-numa cpu,node-id=0,socket-id=1,cluster-id=0,core-id=0,thread-id=0 "
"-numa cpu,node-id=1,socket-id=0,cluster-id=0,core-id=0,thread-id=0");
qts = qtest_init(cli);
cpus = get_cpus(qts, &resp);
g_assert(cpus);

while ((e = qlist_pop(cpus))) {
QDict *cpu, *props;
int64_t thread, node;
int64_t socket, cluster, core, thread, node;

cpu = qobject_to(QDict, e);
g_assert(qdict_haskey(cpu, "props"));
props = qdict_get_qdict(cpu, "props");

g_assert(qdict_haskey(props, "node-id"));
node = qdict_get_int(props, "node-id");
g_assert(qdict_haskey(props, "socket-id"));
socket = qdict_get_int(props, "socket-id");
g_assert(qdict_haskey(props, "cluster-id"));
cluster = qdict_get_int(props, "cluster-id");
g_assert(qdict_haskey(props, "core-id"));
core = qdict_get_int(props, "core-id");
g_assert(qdict_haskey(props, "thread-id"));
thread = qdict_get_int(props, "thread-id");

if (thread == 0) {
if (socket == 0 && cluster == 0 && core == 0 && thread == 0) {
g_assert_cmpint(node, ==, 1);
} else if (thread == 1) {
} else if (socket == 1 && cluster == 0 && core == 0 && thread == 0) {
g_assert_cmpint(node, ==, 0);
} else {
g_assert(false);
Expand Down

0 comments on commit e280ecb

Please sign in to comment.