Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Relation Reference: Limit number of entries (resp. unlimit it) per widget (Request in QGIS) #8128

Closed
qgis-bot opened this issue Mar 24, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #8972
Closed

Comments

@qgis-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Request for documentation

From pull request qgis/QGIS#52246
Author: @signedav
QGIS version: 3.32

Relation Reference: Limit number of entries (resp. unlimit it) per widget

PR Description:

Possiblity to set the limit of values in the Relation Reference Widget:

image

Before the limit of the RelationReference could have been configured over the very hidden Advanced Settings and has been set per QGIS Profile (local) and generally for all RelationReference widgets (and the example drop-down in the Expression Builder).
image

Means, when no setting has been done yet (on new or old projects), the value from the local Advanced Setting is read into the widget settings (on opening the configuration) and the option to set a limit is activated

Backwards compatibilty:

As mentioned: When no setting has been done yet (on new or old projects), the value from the local Advanced Setting is read into the widget settings (on opening the configuration) and the option to set a limit is activated. After storing, this value is considered (even when the user changes the value of the Advanced Setting). When deactivating the "Limit number of entries", the limit is not considered (fetchLimit is set to 0), but the value in the setting persists in case of activating it again. On doing no configuration at all, the setting from the Advanced Setting is considered as well.

Commits tagged with [need-docs] or [FEATURE]

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants