Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Expose settings for overriding selection color and selection symbol for vector layers (Request in QGIS) #8414

Closed
qgis-bot opened this issue Jul 29, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #8527
Labels
3.34 Properties Showcase/Screenshots Add or update a QGIS GUI image or an illustration of the feature Vector
Milestone

Comments

@qgis-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Request for documentation

From pull request qgis/QGIS#53977
Author: @nyalldawson
QGIS version: 3.34

Expose settings for overriding selection color and selection symbol for vector layers

PR Description:

Allows for users to control whether a specific color or symbol should be used in place of the defaults for a particular layer. This is useful to improve the visibility of selected features with certain symbology. E.g:

  • if the layer uses a yellow color by default then the standard yellow selection won't be visible
  • if a line layer uses a thin symbol, then coloring the lines might not make them visible enough -- in this case overriding the symbol with a thicker line can help
  • if the layer uses raster symbology or gradient fills/lines/shapeburst with color ramp symbology, then the default selection color is not applied at all. In this case the user can now set a specific simpler symbol to use for selected features in the layer.

image

Fixes qgis/QGIS#14467
Fixes qgis/QGIS#19242
Fixes qgis/QGIS#21828
Fixes qgis/QGIS#24593
Fixes qgis/QGIS#22778

Commits tagged with [need-docs] or [FEATURE]

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3.34 Properties Showcase/Screenshots Add or update a QGIS GUI image or an illustration of the feature Vector
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants