I'm not sure, it may depend on Qt versions + platform + your screen, on my screen I find the standard cross cursor a bit too thin but maybe it's just me.
For sure we loose control over it, I would prefer to use our custom cross-hair in all occasions or we are back to the previous situation that led to the introduction of our themable cursors in the first place.
So, this is what I suggest:
if QgsApplication::Cursor::CrossHair does not look good fix it instead of replacing it
always use QgsApplication::Cursor::CrossHair unless it does not look good in that particular situation: in that case, create another QgsApplication::Cursor that suit the need
This comment has been minimized.
Why? How does it look on hidpi?
This comment has been minimized.
@elpaso it's a follow up to #7192
This comment has been minimized.
Wouldn't be better to create a variant of
QgsApplication::Cursor::CrossHair
and make part of the theme?This comment has been minimized.
@elpaso I might be mistaken, but I thought using the qt standard cursors avoided all issues with hidpi and scaling?
This comment has been minimized.
I'm not sure, it may depend on Qt versions + platform + your screen, on my screen I find the standard cross cursor a bit too thin but maybe it's just me.
For sure we loose control over it, I would prefer to use our custom cross-hair in all occasions or we are back to the previous situation that led to the introduction of our themable cursors in the first place.
So, this is what I suggest:
This of course would also apply to #7192
This comment has been minimized.
I'm fine with always using a custom one, so long as we're consistent with it and never use the standard one
This comment has been minimized.