Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Request for "Zoom to best resolution" feature #10519

Closed
qgib opened this issue Dec 18, 2006 · 3 comments
Closed

Request for "Zoom to best resolution" feature #10519

qgib opened this issue Dec 18, 2006 · 3 comments
Labels
Feature Request Rasters Related to general raster layer handling (not specific data formats)

Comments

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor

qgib commented Dec 18, 2006

Author Name: lars-luthman-gmail-com - (lars-luthman-gmail-com -)
Original Redmine Issue: 460

Redmine category:rasters
Assignee: Magnus Homann


When working with rasters it would be very nice to have a way to zoom directly to the best resolution for a raster layer, i.e. displaying 1 raster pixel as 1 screen pixel. It could be a new entry "Zoom to best resolution for layer" in the layer popup menu for raster layers.

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Feb 27, 2007

Author Name: Magnus Homann (@homann)


  • status_id was changed from Open to In Progress

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Feb 28, 2007

Author Name: Magnus Homann (@homann)


Added this in .


  • resolution was changed from to fixed
  • status_id was changed from In Progress to Closed

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Aug 21, 2009

Author Name: Anónimo (Anónimo)


Milestone Version 0.9 deleted

@qgib qgib added Feature Request Rasters Related to general raster layer handling (not specific data formats) labels May 24, 2019
@qgib qgib closed this as completed May 24, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Feature Request Rasters Related to general raster layer handling (not specific data formats)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant