-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support keyword substitution in provider queries #14306
Comments
Author Name: Paolo Cavallini (@pcav)
|
Author Name: Giovanni Manghi (@gioman)
|
Author Name: Giovanni Manghi (@gioman)
|
Author Name: Pirmin Kalberer (Pirmin Kalberer)
|
Author Name: Andreas Wicht (@andywicht) That would be a great change in order to make actual use of the postgis_topology in QGIS. For tiny topologies it would not make much of a difference, but for the bigger ones. That would enable anybody to utilise QGIS for the editing process of large postgis topologies as no custom web-gis solutions would have to be developed. Reconsidering the target version would be highly appreciated by me :-) |
Author Name: Sandro Santilli (@strk) I guess "target version" could be changed if someone provides an actual patchset to implement the keyword substitution. |
Author Name: Giovanni Manghi (@gioman)
|
One problem with keyword substitution is that attributes fetching would then end up depending on current extent (unless we have the substitution pass an "universe" bounding box in that case) |
@andywicht could you please take a look at #31468 ? |
Author Name: Sandro Santilli (@strk)
Original Redmine Issue: 4374
Redmine category:data_provider
When fetching features from a query it would be useful to allow using keywords to be substituted on each fetching.
Such keywords, in particular pixel sizes and extent, could be used by the query to preprocess geometries (like DP-simplification, grid snapping etc.) and reduce the amount of geometries fetched (using extent information).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: