Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

2 "Browser" entries in View->Panels... #16541

Closed
qgib opened this issue Apr 14, 2013 · 8 comments
Closed

2 "Browser" entries in View->Panels... #16541

qgib opened this issue Apr 14, 2013 · 8 comments
Labels
Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter!

Comments

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor

qgib commented Apr 14, 2013

Author Name: Giuseppe Sucameli (@brushtyler)
Original Redmine Issue: 7613
Affected QGIS version: master


In View->Panels there are 2 browser entries: "Browser", "Browser (2)".
One must be removed.

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Apr 14, 2013

Author Name: Borys Jurgiel (@borysiasty)


I think two browsers were introduced intentionally, however, the way they co-exist in the menu is quite ugly...

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Apr 14, 2013

Author Name: Giuseppe Sucameli (@brushtyler)


Borys Jurgiel wrote:

I think two browsers were introduced intentionally

I've thought the same, but I'm unable to understand why...

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Apr 14, 2013

Author Name: Giovanni Manghi (@gioman)


Giuseppe Sucameli wrote:

Borys Jurgiel wrote:

I think two browsers were introduced intentionally

I've thought the same, but I'm unable to understand why...

my idea? because dragging and dropping from the toc is not possible and d&d in the same browser is not very functional when you have folders with a lot of layers and a lot of postgis/sl connections :)

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Apr 14, 2013

Author Name: Jürgen Fischer (@jef-n)


Giovanni Manghi wrote:

my idea? because dragging and dropping from the toc is not possible and d&d in the same browser is not very functional when you have folders with a lot of layers and a lot of postgis/sl connections :)

Hey, it's not your's, it's mine! ;) But appearently the reasoning is not unique.

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Jun 3, 2013

Author Name: Radim Blazek (@blazek)


Ugly and confusing, I was convinced that the Browser 2 is a new version of browser.

What about usual "split window" in the browser widget, which would split the widget into two parts with one browser in each part?

Browser 2 should not appear be in 2.0 IMO.

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Feb 25, 2014

Author Name: Donovan Cameron (@saultdon)


I think it should only be one browser panel entry in the qgis application or explain to the users what makes Browser(2) unique.

I'm comparing them and have trouble noticing any visual or functional difference. Is there something special about Browser(2)?

If users want multiple browser(s), can't users just launch the QGIS-Browser application separately and as many times as they like?

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Feb 25, 2014

Author Name: Giovanni Manghi (@gioman)


Donovan Cameron wrote:

I think it should only be one browser panel entry in the qgis application or explain to the users what makes Browser(2) unique.

I'm comparing them and have trouble noticing any visual or functional difference. Is there something special about Browser(2)?

If users want multiple browser(s), can't users just launch the QGIS-Browser application separately and as many times as they like?

see #16541 (comment)

until d&d from/to toc is not available, then browser(2) is actually useful (sometimes).

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Jun 21, 2014

Author Name: Jürgen Fischer (@jef-n)


it's not a bug, it's a feature.


  • status_id was changed from Open to Closed
  • resolution was changed from to worksforme

@qgib qgib added the Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter! label May 24, 2019
@qgib qgib closed this as completed May 24, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter!
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant