Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Digitizing] Snapping marker is not shown when the advanced digitizing panel is enabled #26957

Closed
qgib opened this issue Jun 6, 2018 · 10 comments
Labels
Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter! Digitizing Related to feature digitizing map tools or functionality High Priority Regression Something which used to work, but doesn't anymore

Comments

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor

qgib commented Jun 6, 2018

Author Name: Harrissou Santanna (@DelazJ)
Original Redmine Issue: 19127
Affected QGIS version: 3.1(master)
Redmine category:digitising


I don't know if it's me not yet used to the new and different markers shown when digitizing but it looks like the snapping marker does not show when the advanced digitizing panel is enabled.
For example, enable snapping settings and the "Add feature(s)" tool (or "Move feature(s)" or I guess any other)
Hover over a vertex so that the marker shows (default square). Ok
Now enable the advanced digitizing panel
Hover over the same vertex. Nothing happens.

I don't remember how it was in previous releases but i'd bet for a regression...


Related issue(s): #26000 (duplicates)
Redmine related issue(s): 18104


@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Aug 27, 2018

Author Name: Nathan Perry (Nathan Perry)


There does not seem to be a distinct snapping marker for advanced digitizing, but there is a small X cursor that will snap to any locations that are enabled in snapping options. This cursor does tend to disappear after a certain amount of use, which may be the problem described here. I haven't yet identified what steps cause it to disappear.

In addition to the small X, there is a large "crosshair" cursor that is always present, and that does not align correctly to the point being digitized (it appears to align at its upper left corner, rather than at the center of the crosshair).

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Aug 29, 2018

Author Name: Giovanni Manghi (@gioman)


In addition to the small X, there is a large "crosshair" cursor that is always present, and that does not align correctly to the point being digitized (it appears to align at its upper left corner, rather than at the center of the crosshair).

are you on macOS?

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Aug 29, 2018

Author Name: Giovanni Manghi (@gioman)


Seems also a regression to me. Tagging so until proven contrary.


  • priority_id was changed from Normal to High
  • regression was changed from 0 to 1

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Aug 29, 2018

Author Name: Harrissou Santanna (@DelazJ)


@nathan

There does not seem to be a distinct snapping marker for advanced digitizing, but there is a small X cursor that will snap to any locations that are enabled in snapping options.

This is the issue I was reporting, ie:

  1. without the panel enabled, when you move a vertex, you have no marker (just the mouse pointer). The marker appears when you are about to snap something. And by default this marker is "magenta square";
  2. if the advanced digitizing panel is enabled, you automatically have a lighter "crosshair" marker (maybe it wasn't there at the time I created the report) which is btw always displayed even at the snapping time, meaning that there's no obvious visual way to ensure you get the catch (like the square marker does in the previous case)

This cursor does tend to disappear after a certain amount of use, which may be the problem described here. I haven't yet identified what steps cause it to disappear.

I can't reproduce the disparition issue.

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Aug 31, 2018

Author Name: Nathan Perry (Nathan Perry)


Giovanni Manghi wrote:

are you on macOS?

Yes, 10.13.6.

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Aug 31, 2018

Author Name: Giovanni Manghi (@gioman)


Nathan Perry wrote:

Giovanni Manghi wrote:

are you on macOS?

Yes, 10.13.6.

#26510 ?

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Oct 24, 2018

Author Name: Loïc BARTOLETTI (@lbartoletti)


Is a duplicate of #26000 ?

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Oct 24, 2018

Author Name: Giovanni Manghi (@gioman)


  • status_id was changed from Open to Feedback

@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Oct 24, 2018

Author Name: Harrissou Santanna (@DelazJ)


@qgib
Copy link
Contributor Author

qgib commented Oct 24, 2018

Author Name: Harrissou Santanna (@DelazJ)


  • resolution was changed from to duplicate
  • status_id was changed from Feedback to Closed

@qgib qgib closed this as completed Oct 24, 2018
@qgib qgib added Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter! High Priority Digitizing Related to feature digitizing map tools or functionality Regression Something which used to work, but doesn't anymore labels May 25, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter! Digitizing Related to feature digitizing map tools or functionality High Priority Regression Something which used to work, but doesn't anymore
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant