We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Describe the bug Rule-based filter ignore provider specific filter on .shp if:
How to Reproduce
filter-test.zip
create a shape file with text filed, and write numbers to it.
define provider specific filter
create categorized style with automatic classify -> it use numbers instead of string, but working
change the style to rule-based (or define rule-based style manually), and delete the ELSE rule
every feature displayed (provider specific filter ignored)
QGIS and OS versions
QGIS version | 3.10.6 OS Version | Windows 10 (10.0)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
[ogr] Fix layer subset string is ignored when OGR refuses to accept
aa2d248
a compiled feature request expression Fixes qgis#37073
b5b4221
a compiled feature request expression Fixes #37073
f486cf6
a compiled feature request expression Fixes qgis#37073 (cherry picked from commit aa2d248)
eb63bb3
a compiled feature request expression Fixes #37073 (cherry picked from commit aa2d248)
nyalldawson
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Describe the bug
Rule-based filter ignore provider specific filter on .shp if:
How to Reproduce
filter-test.zip
create a shape file with text filed, and write numbers to it.
define provider specific filter
create categorized style with automatic classify -> it use numbers instead of string, but working
change the style to rule-based (or define rule-based style manually), and delete the ELSE rule
every feature displayed (provider specific filter ignored)
QGIS and OS versions
QGIS version | 3.10.6
OS Version | Windows 10 (10.0)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: