Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

"explode lines" processing tool removes features if more than one feature are selected when "Automatic Creation of Transaction Group" is enabled #39177

Closed
faridcher opened this issue Oct 5, 2020 · 17 comments
Closed

"explode lines" processing tool removes features if more than one feature are selected when "Automatic Creation of Transaction Group" is enabled #39177

faridcher opened this issue Oct 5, 2020 · 17 comments
Labels
Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter! Feedback Waiting on the submitter for answers Processing Relating to QGIS Processing framework or individual Processing algorithms stale Uh oh! Seems this work is abandoned, and the PR is about to close.

Comments

@faridcher
Copy link

Describe the bug
"Explode Lines" tool successfully explodes a single Linestring feature. But if more than one features are selected, it deletes some of them.

How to Reproduce
create a linear layer in a Geopackage. Digitize at least two Linestring (with more than one segment) feature. Select them and run "explode lines" processing algorithm on the selected features.
image

QGIS and OS versions
Qgis 3.10.9 on Debian unstable

Additional context
@faridcher faridcher added the Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter! label Oct 5, 2020
@faridcher faridcher changed the title explode lines removes features if more than one feature are selected "explode lines" processing tool removes features if more than one feature are selected Oct 5, 2020
@gioman gioman added Feedback Waiting on the submitter for answers Processing Relating to QGIS Processing framework or individual Processing algorithms labels Oct 5, 2020
@gioman
Copy link
Contributor

gioman commented Oct 5, 2020

@faridcher cannot confirm on QGIS 3.10.10, Ubuntu 20.04.

@faridcher
Copy link
Author

upgraded to 3.10.10 and the problem persists. Ubuntu is Debian derivative and I don't think it is OS specific. I can record a video if that helps.

thanks

@gioman
Copy link
Contributor

gioman commented Oct 6, 2020

upgraded to 3.10.10 and the problem persists. Ubuntu is Debian derivative and I don't think it is OS specific. I can record a video if that helps.

@faridcher try with a new QGIS profile.

@faridcher
Copy link
Author

A new profile did not help. However, the problem relates to the qgis project file and it occurs when "Automatic Creation of Transaction Group" is enabled in the "Project Properties > Data Sources". Un-checking that option solves it.

@gioman gioman changed the title "explode lines" processing tool removes features if more than one feature are selected "explode lines" processing tool removes features if more than one feature are selected when "Automatic Creation of Transaction Group" is enabled Oct 6, 2020
@gioman gioman mentioned this issue Oct 6, 2020
Closed
@gioman gioman removed the Feedback Waiting on the submitter for answers label Oct 6, 2020
@faridcher faridcher mentioned this issue Oct 7, 2020
Closed
@elpaso
Copy link
Contributor

elpaso commented Oct 8, 2020

This may be fixed by #39257 with GDAL >= 2.3.0.

@Pedro-Murteira
Copy link

Couldn't reproduce this issue on QGIS 3.22.4 and 3.24.0. @faridcher Did you come across this issue in more recent versions?

@gioman gioman added the Feedback Waiting on the submitter for answers label Feb 24, 2022
@faridcher
Copy link
Author

Still present in QGIS 3.22.4. @Pedro-Murteira did you enable "transaction groups" in "project properties" dialog before testing?

@gioman gioman removed the Feedback Waiting on the submitter for answers label Feb 25, 2022
@Pedro-Murteira
Copy link

@faridcher I didn't, but I've tested just now with "transaction groups" checked, and I can also confirm.

@alexbruy
Copy link
Contributor

Not reproducible with the latest master (f344919). With and without "Automatic Transactions Group" nothing is removed.

@alexbruy alexbruy added the Feedback Waiting on the submitter for answers label Sep 22, 2023
@faridcher
Copy link
Author

@alexbruy thank you for testing. I am unable to test with master but is still present in 3.28.11. Did you select more than one feature?

@alexbruy
Copy link
Contributor

I tested using the same steps as in the issue description, with selected features.

@github-actions
Copy link

The QGIS project highly values your report and would love to see it addressed. However, this issue has been left in feedback mode for the last 14 days and is being automatically marked as "stale".
If you would like to continue with this issue, please provide any missing information or answer any open questions. If you could resolve the issue yourself meanwhile, please leave a note for future readers with the same problem and close the issue.
In case you should have any uncertainty, please leave a comment and we will be happy to help you proceed with this issue.
If there is no further activity on this issue, it will be closed in a week.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale Uh oh! Seems this work is abandoned, and the PR is about to close. label Oct 10, 2023
@faridcher
Copy link
Author

@alexbruy please state your exact version instead of "master". I and many others are unable to test with master. thanks

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the stale Uh oh! Seems this work is abandoned, and the PR is about to close. label Oct 10, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

The QGIS project highly values your report and would love to see it addressed. However, this issue has been left in feedback mode for the last 14 days and is being automatically marked as "stale".
If you would like to continue with this issue, please provide any missing information or answer any open questions. If you could resolve the issue yourself meanwhile, please leave a note for future readers with the same problem and close the issue.
In case you should have any uncertainty, please leave a comment and we will be happy to help you proceed with this issue.
If there is no further activity on this issue, it will be closed in a week.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale Uh oh! Seems this work is abandoned, and the PR is about to close. label Oct 25, 2023
@alexbruy
Copy link
Contributor

@faridcher right now I'm on a2643b8

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the stale Uh oh! Seems this work is abandoned, and the PR is about to close. label Nov 13, 2023
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

The QGIS project highly values your report and would love to see it addressed. However, this issue has been left in feedback mode for the last 14 days and is being automatically marked as "stale".
If you would like to continue with this issue, please provide any missing information or answer any open questions. If you could resolve the issue yourself meanwhile, please leave a note for future readers with the same problem and close the issue.
In case you should have any uncertainty, please leave a comment and we will be happy to help you proceed with this issue.
If there is no further activity on this issue, it will be closed in a week.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale Uh oh! Seems this work is abandoned, and the PR is about to close. label Nov 28, 2023
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

While we hate to see this happen, this issue has been automatically closed because it has not had any activity in the last 42 days despite being marked as feedback. If this issue should be reconsidered, please follow the guidelines in the previous comment and reopen this issue.
Or, if you have any further questions, there are also further support channels that can help you.

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Dec 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter! Feedback Waiting on the submitter for answers Processing Relating to QGIS Processing framework or individual Processing algorithms stale Uh oh! Seems this work is abandoned, and the PR is about to close.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
5 participants
@elpaso @alexbruy @gioman @faridcher @Pedro-Murteira