Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature simplification for oracle provider #2738

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 30, 2016

Conversation

ahuarte47
Copy link
Contributor

This pull implements the feature simplification for oracle provider using the SDO_UTIL.SIMPLIFY function.

It is entirely similar like the Postgres provider does with the ST_Simplify function.

jef-n added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2016
Feature simplification for oracle provider
@jef-n jef-n merged commit 939fc83 into qgis:master Jan 30, 2016
@ahuarte47 ahuarte47 deleted the OracleSimplifyProviderSide branch January 30, 2016 00:48
@ahuarte47
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks a lot! @jef-n , I saw your changes about oracle version capabilities

@jef-n
Copy link
Member

jef-n commented Jan 30, 2016

I was just about doing the same ;)

@ahuarte47
Copy link
Contributor Author

Related to:
https://hub.qgis.org/issues/12298

nyalldawson added a commit to nyalldawson/QGIS that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2017
This change allows customised legends within composer templates
to be correctly restored when creating a new composition from
the template in a different project.

The legend layers will be attached to any loaded layers with a
matching data source as the layer from the original template
composition.

Fix qgis#2738

Sponsored by ENEL, on behalf of Faunalia
nyalldawson added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2017
[composer] Restore legend customisation from composer templates (Fix #2738)
nyalldawson added a commit to nyalldawson/QGIS that referenced this pull request Apr 18, 2017
customisation

Allows legend customisation to be restored when loading a composer
template

Fix qgis#2738
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants