Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Attribute table: please don't delete randomly! #32952

Merged

Conversation

elpaso
Copy link
Contributor

@elpaso elpaso commented Nov 19, 2019

Fixes #32933

Pretty big fat bug isn't it ?

Funded by Spare Time (is) LTD

Fixes qgis#32933

Pretty big fat bug isn't it ?
@elpaso elpaso added backport release-3_4 Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter! labels Nov 19, 2019
@gioman
Copy link
Contributor

gioman commented Nov 19, 2019

Funded by Spare Time (is) LTD

@elpaso I'm sincerely thankful for all the effort, thanks.

Pretty big fat bug isn't it ?

yes, horrifying.

instead of passing an index that could belong to
one of the (three) models that live in the dual
view.

This hopefully makes the code a bit less error
prone and readable.

Fixes qgis#32952
@nyalldawson nyalldawson merged commit bcdbc3a into qgis:master Nov 20, 2019
nyalldawson pushed a commit to nyalldawson/QGIS that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2019
instead of passing an index that could belong to
one of the (three) models that live in the dual
view.

This hopefully makes the code a bit less error
prone and readable.

Fixes qgis#32952

(cherry picked from commit bcdbc3a)
nyalldawson pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2019
instead of passing an index that could belong to
one of the (three) models that live in the dual
view.

This hopefully makes the code a bit less error
prone and readable.

Fixes #32952

(cherry picked from commit bcdbc3a)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug Either a bug report, or a bug fix. Let's hope for the latter!
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

In form view wrong features/records are deleted
3 participants