[FEATURE][Symbology] Add percantage size unit for Raster Image Marker Layer symbology.

[beketata]

Description

According to Feature Request this patch adds new percentage (percents of original image size) size unit for Raster Image Marker Layer.

[nyalldawson]

Nice feature! Are you confident adding a unit test too?

[nirvn]

@beketata , nice addition. If you want to go the extra mile -> it'd be nice to have the same feature applied to the raster fill symbol.

[beketata]

@nirvn , nice addition. If you want to go the extra mile -> it'd be nice to have the same feature applied to the raster fill symbol.

Default value of Image width for Raster image fill is already Original. Or do you mean smth else?

[nirvn]

@beketata , right, but you could have it at say 50% (of original size) etc.

[beketata]

According to tests details Test # 545: PyQgsPostgresRasterProvider is failed.
Could anyone please advise me what to do next? My development environment is MS Visual Studio.

[beketata]

I did the same patch adding new percentage size unit for Raster image fill layer.

[beketata]

Unfortunately some checks were not successful.
In the details I could see the following info:
Download cygwin Installer
##[error]Cmd.exe exited with code '28'.

Could someone please advise me what to do next?

[roya0045]

Nothing, this test fail as there are some issue with our pipeline, just ignore it.

[stale]

The QGIS project highly values your contribution and would love to see this work merged! Unfortunately this PR has not had any activity in the last 14 days and is being automatically marked as "stale". If you think this pull request should be merged, please check

• that all unit tests are passing

• that all comments by reviewers have been addressed

• that there is enough information for reviewers, in particular

  • link to any issues which this pull request fixes

  • add a description of workflows which this pull request fixes

  • add screenshots if applicable

• that you have written unit tests where possible
  In case you should have any uncertainty, please leave a comment and we will be happy to help you proceed with this pull request.
  If there is no further activity on this pull request, it will be closed in a week.

[beketata]

I received the stale[bot] notification that "this PR has not had any activity ... If there is no further activity ... it will be closed".
What kind of "activity" are you waiting for?

[roya0045]

The tests I would guess.

[beketata]

Thank you all for the great support!

[Gustry]

@beketata,

@nyalldawson and @roya0045 were asking if you could add new tests?

@roya0045 told you to not worry about the existing failing test if it's a false positive. (I didn't check)

From the stale message above:

that you have written unit tests where possible
In case you should have any uncertainty, please leave a comment and we will be happy to help you proceed with this pull request.