Review the ticket configuration on GitHub

[Gustry]

Description

There is also a new feature in github to create "form" : https://github.blog/changelog/2021-06-23-issues-forms-beta-for-public-repositories/
I have'n looked yet at these forms.

CC @DelazJ @gioman

[m-kuhn]

Does this change anything or is it just cleaning up the files?
Happy to merge but missing a tiny bit of context here.

[Gustry]

Yes, it is updating a little bit.
It means you can't open tickets without a label. You also can't open a ticket for a external plugin.

My master branch was not up to date (missing the QGIS plugin entry), but I tried there first : https://github.com/Gustry/QGIS/issues/new/choose

[DelazJ]

Sorry @Gustry for the delay and thanks for the explanation (that I also missed). A good idea imho. So no more won't fix generated issue?

[gioman]

@Gustry sorry for the late reply, I missed the notification. Great improvement! Also if we could turn the template into a form would be really really great. I will look into it too.

[github-actions]

The QGIS project highly values your contribution and would love to see this work merged! Unfortunately this PR has not had any activity in the last 14 days and is being automatically marked as "stale". If you think this pull request should be merged, please check

• that all unit tests are passing

• that all comments by reviewers have been addressed

• that there is enough information for reviewers, in particular

  • link to any issues which this pull request fixes

  • add a description of workflows which this pull request fixes

  • add screenshots if applicable

• that you have written unit tests where possible
  In case you should have any uncertainty, please leave a comment and we will be happy to help you proceed with this pull request.
  If there is no further activity on this pull request, it will be closed in a week.

[Gustry]

New version available for preview on my fork : https://github.com/Gustry/QGIS/issues/new/choose

@DelazJ I have updated about the documentation : desktop versus c++/pyqgis

[gioman]

New version available for preview on my fork : https://github.com/Gustry/QGIS/issues/new/choose

@Gustry nice!

[m-kuhn]

Nice !

I would suggest to

• rename "C++ or PyQGIS Documentation" to "API documentation (C++ or PyQGIS)"
• rename "Documentation on the desktop or server side" to "Documentation (desktop and server)" and adapt the description to "Suggest improvements or report errors regarding https://docs.qgis.org"

[Gustry]

Updated.

Still the preview on my fork : https://github.com/Gustry/QGIS/issues/new/choose

[m-kuhn]

I'm in favor of merging this, we can fine tune later on.
Thanks a lot !

[nirvn]

Merge at will!

[Gustry]

In the meantime, I have check how to have a form : https://docs.github.com/en/communities/using-templates-to-encourage-useful-issues-and-pull-requests/configuring-issue-templates-for-your-repository#creating-issue-forms

So files have switched to YML instead of markdown.

You can have a look to the form preview on my fork, link above.

[DelazJ]

LGTM. Thanks @Gustry .

[Gustry]

This PR is only changing the .github folder so CI is not relevant. Some other workflows are still required and pending for this PR.

[m-kuhn]

I guess those other workflows are not triggered because the paths don't match (https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/blob/master/.github/workflows/run-tests.yml#L9-L17) but they are still required.

@3nids do you see a solution for that (other than removing the path filter)?

[3nids]

@m-kuhn builds are currently failing on Fedora with Qt6 and tests are not run. I recently fixed this by always making the tests run.

[Gustry]

Can someone (with admin rights) merge manually ?