[bug/feature?] Improve array_remove_at function #46942
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Please confirm that you have built locally and tested this thoroughly and aren't just relying on CI for feedback. |
Yup, all is fine and behave as expected. It can be frozen until the new release of you want. |
elpaso
previously requested changes
Jan 24, 2022
DelazJ
reviewed
Jan 24, 2022
Co-authored-by: Harrissou Sant-anna <delazj@gmail.com>
nyalldawson
reviewed
Jan 31, 2022
nyalldawson
approved these changes
Jan 31, 2022
DelazJ
added a commit
to DelazJ/QGIS-Documentation
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 2, 2022
- add negative index to array_remove_at (qgis/QGIS#46942) - add new parameters to overlay_intersects (qgis/QGIS#46683)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Fixes an undocumented bug where using a value greater than the array size would return a null value instead of the array.
This works also adds support for using a negative index.