-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
updating poetry lock and toml #294
Conversation
pyproject.toml
Outdated
python = ">=3.8, <4" | ||
qibolab = "^0.0.1" | ||
python = ">=3.8,<3.12" | ||
qibolab = "^0.0" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just for personal understanding: you suppressed the .1
because it would have been incompatible with .2
, isn't it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, for this I don't have a strong opinion, we could simply set ^0.0.2
and then update version by version.
However, qibocal seems not compatible with qibo 0.1.12 (the <4
was locking the upgrade in the workflow). @andrea-pasquale are you aware of this problem (see failing tests below)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, for this I don't have a strong opinion, we could simply set
^0.0.2
and then update version by version.
As soon as possible, we should simply start using versions >0.1.0
, and the problem will be partially solved.
With 0.x.y
you only have the MAJOR+MINOR equivalent, and you lose the PATCH number. But with 0.0.x
there is only MAJOR, and it is quite inconvenient...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
However, qibocal seems not compatible with qibo 0.1.12 (the
<4
was locking the upgrade in the workflow). @andrea-pasquale are you aware of this problem (see failing tests below)?
I think that the problem is related to the function copy_circuit
that @wilkensJ introduced in the rb module.
@Edoardo-Pedicillo already fixed this issue in #288 which was merged in #266. As soon as we merge #266 to main and we merge main here tests should pass.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, sorry #261
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #294 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 37.84% 37.84%
=======================================
Files 42 42
Lines 2801 2801
=======================================
Hits 1060 1060
Misses 1741 1741
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. |
Updating to latest qibo 0.1.12.
Checklist: