Changing to_dict in property

[andrea-pasquale]

This PR needs to be merged as soon as we merge qiboteam/qibolab#346, which will change the to_dict method into the property raw. This should resolve all issues related to the attribute average of the to_dict method.

Checklist:

• Reviewers confirm new code works as expected.
• Tests are passing.
• Coverage does not decrease.
• Documentation is updated.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #299 (0a8bd52) into main (9a27c90) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #299   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   37.84%   37.84%           
=======================================
  Files          42       42           
  Lines        2801     2801           
=======================================
  Hits         1060     1060           
  Misses       1741     1741           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	37.84% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

[andrea-pasquale]

I manage to test on qblox the majority of the routines (I am missing the ones involving sampling, two qubit gates and rb).
@stavros11 @rodolfocarobene @Jacfomg when you have time could you please test this branch with qiboteam/qibolab#346 with qm, rfsoc and zurichs? Let me know if this fixes the issues related to the method to_dict.

[rodolfocarobene]

I just tried it and it fixes the issue.
However I had to do a couple of things in the qibolab PR (merge main and initialize all AveragedResults with from_components in the rfsoc driver).

If you want I can push those changes, the merge was without conflicts

[andrea-pasquale]

I just tried it and it fixes the issue. However I had to do a couple of things in the qibolab PR (merge main and initialize all AveragedResults with from_components in the rfsoc driver).

If you want I can push those changes, the merge was without conflicts

Thanks for the feedback @rodolfocarobene.
Feel free to push those changes in qiboteam/qibolab#346.

[Edoardo-Pedicillo]

Thank @andrea-pasquale

[Edoardo-Pedicillo]

I confirm that it works with dummy.

[andrea-pasquale]

@stavros11 I would like to merge this but I'm not able to test it on QM since I don't know exactly what branch to use. I know that the runcard is in qiboteam/qibolab#349 and that you started from main with qiboteam/qibolab#361, however this branch works with qiboteam/qibolab#346 which is also pointing to main.
Given that qiboteam/qibolab#346 does not introduce major changes if you agree we could merge it to main and you can later test it on qiboteam/qibolab#349 or qiboteam/qibolab#361.

[stavros11]

@andrea-pasquale I wanted to test it yesterday but unfortunately the QM went out and as far as I know we have not been able to connect to it yet. I am not sure when it will be back but at this stage we could merge this and qiboteam/qibolab#346 and if something breaks for QM I’ll fix it in one of my other open PRs in qibolab.

[andrea-pasquale]

@andrea-pasquale I wanted to test it yesterday but unfortunately the QM went out and as far as I know we have not been able to connect to it yet. I am not sure when it will be back but at this stage we could merge this and qiboteam/qibolab#346 and if something breaks for QM I’ll fix it in one of my other open PRs in qibolab.

Thanks. I'll proceed with the merge as soon as we merge qiboteam/qibolab#346.