Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

mv to slurm #3208

Merged
merged 21 commits into from
Aug 23, 2022
Merged

mv to slurm #3208

merged 21 commits into from
Aug 23, 2022

Conversation

antgonza
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@antgonza antgonza changed the title mv to slurm [WIP] mv to slurm Aug 10, 2022
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Aug 11, 2022

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.07%) to 92.902% when pulling 04c350b on antgonza:slurm into 05f046e on qiita-spots:dev.

@antgonza antgonza changed the title [WIP] mv to slurm mv to slurm Aug 23, 2022
trq_dependency_q_cnt : int
job_scheduler_owner : str
Email address of submitter of jobs
job_scheduler_poll_val : int
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not really a request, but just an observation: job_scheduler sounds platform-neutral, but this really is a migration to slurm. slurm might be more descriptive because the code is slurm-specific.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Glad that you pointed that out; the plan was to make it as neutral as possible so the next time we only need to change the slurm commands to whatever is new without having to change the variable names ... which was a pain!

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can imagine!

@charles-cowart charles-cowart merged commit 85fe753 into qiita-spots:dev Aug 23, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants