You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 16, 2023. It is now read-only.
Let n represent the value of max_vars_per_qubit. Let's further assume that n is not 1, i.e. it is either 2 or 3. Depending on the variables-to-qubits assignment, it is possible that some qubits will have fewer than n decision variables assigned. However, at the moment, such qubits will still be encoded as an (n,1,p) QRAC. Ideally, the encoding on each qubit will be "adaptive," such that it uses an (m_i,1,p) QRAC, where m_i is the precise number of decision variables assigned to that qubit.
This is not difficult to fix, but we need to fix #7 first (update: done!); otherwise, magic rounding would no longer work generally.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
What is the expected enhancement?
Let n represent the value of
max_vars_per_qubit
. Let's further assume that n is not 1, i.e. it is either 2 or 3. Depending on the variables-to-qubits assignment, it is possible that some qubits will have fewer than n decision variables assigned. However, at the moment, such qubits will still be encoded as an (n,1,p) QRAC. Ideally, the encoding on each qubit will be "adaptive," such that it uses an (m_i,1,p) QRAC, where m_i is the precise number of decision variables assigned to that qubit.This is not difficult to fix, but we need to fix #7 first (update: done!); otherwise, magic rounding would no longer work generally.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: