-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding classical control #1
Comments
@willzeng it is coming soon: currently you can add only condition (QASM’s “if” translates to QUIL’s “jump”). Other control constructs will be added soon - QUIL parser is next thing to be added to “quantum-circuit”. |
Later today I will publish video with instructions how to add classical control (condition) to circuit in GUI. By the way, I found a bug related to exporting conditions to pyQuil and QUIL, will fix that later today and deploy fixed version of the GUI. |
OK, I fixed some bugs and published latest "quantum-circuit" npm module and latest "Quantum Programming Studio".
P.S. in the video you can see that I am simulating using Rigetti QCS (running on QVM inside QMI), but that feature is not available yet ( |
That's great! I was able to finish the teleportation example: https://quantum-circuit.com/app_details/about/YpHEBY4QEJyB5G5i5 |
@willzeng fixed and deployed - works perfectly. I will close this issue now. |
Any chance of adding classical control to circuits in the editor? This is often a great way of comparing QASM and Quil and takes some of the most effort to convert.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: