Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Standardize component registration and their config #145

Closed
Quentin-M opened this issue Apr 19, 2016 · 0 comments
Closed

Standardize component registration and their config #145

Quentin-M opened this issue Apr 19, 2016 · 0 comments
Labels
area/usability related to improving user experience kind/cleanup no functional changes, only reorganization kind/design relates to the fundamental design of a component

Comments

@Quentin-M
Copy link
Contributor

Quentin-M commented Apr 19, 2016 •
edited
Loading

One example is that v1.0.0 doesn't support specifying database-implementation specific configuration blocks. More generally, we should improve and standardize the registration story.
@Quentin-M Quentin-M added this to the 2.0 milestone Apr 19, 2016
@jzelinskie jzelinskie added area/usability related to improving user experience kind/cleanup no functional changes, only reorganization kind/design relates to the fundamental design of a component component/config labels Apr 19, 2016
Quentin-M added a commit to Quentin-M/clair that referenced this issue May 2, 2016
@Quentin-M
database: Allow specifying datastore driver by config
fbc22c9 
Fixes quay#145
Quentin-M added a commit to Quentin-M/clair that referenced this issue May 11, 2016
@Quentin-M
database: Allow specifying datastore driver by config
952ff45 
Fixes quay#145
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
area/usability related to improving user experience kind/cleanup no functional changes, only reorganization kind/design relates to the fundamental design of a component
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@jzelinskie @Quentin-M