Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add unit tests #11

Closed
modocache opened this issue Jun 8, 2014 · 3 comments
Closed

Add unit tests #11

modocache opened this issue Jun 8, 2014 · 3 comments
Labels
blocked enhancement

Comments

@modocache
Copy link
Member

Right now Quick is mainly tested via functional tests. Add a more comprehensive unit test suite, using XCTestCase, for the classes and functions in Core.
@sharplet sharplet mentioned this issue Jun 9, 2014
Closed
jgable added a commit to jgable/Quick that referenced this issue Jun 10, 2014
@jgable
Add example tests
228b358 
Ref Quick#11

- Add ExampleTests file with testExamples method
@modocache modocache changed the title Add unit tests for Core classes [Quick, Nimble] Add unit tests for Core classes Jun 18, 2014
@modocache modocache changed the title [Quick, Nimble] Add unit tests for Core classes Add unit tests Aug 26, 2014
@TomasLinhart TomasLinhart mentioned this issue Sep 4, 2014
Closed
@modocache modocache added this to the v1.0.0 milestone Nov 18, 2014
@modocache
Copy link
Member Author

This should be made possible thanks to #287.

@modocache modocache removed this from the v1.0.0 milestone Jun 15, 2015
@jeffh
Copy link
Member

jeffh commented Aug 17, 2015

Hey @modocache,

Is this issue still relevant? What is the required work for this?

@modocache
Copy link
Member Author

Not super relevant, but I was planning on tackling it after #287. Theoretically, decoupling Qiuck and XCTest would allow one to test how Quick behaves without mucking up the current test run.

This issue should probably be cleaned up for now, though--not much point in having an issue to "include unit tests once things are more testable." 😛

@bupojung bupojung mentioned this issue Aug 9, 2019
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
blocked enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@jeffh @modocache and others