Script updating issues at 2020-01-17T05:39:49Z. [ci skip]

issues.json

@@ -4409,7 +4409,7 @@
         "description": null
       }
     ],
-    "state": "open",
+    "state": "closed",
     "locked": false,
     "assignee": null,
     "assignees": [
@@ -4418,8 +4418,8 @@
     "milestone": null,
     "comments": 1,
     "created_at": "2019-12-06T15:48:46Z",
-    "updated_at": "2020-01-14T21:12:30Z",
-    "closed_at": null,
+    "updated_at": "2020-01-17T05:37:10Z",
+    "closed_at": "2020-01-17T05:37:09Z",
     "author_association": "CONTRIBUTOR",
     "pull_request": {
       "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/quicwg/base-drafts/pulls/3287",
@@ -7319,7 +7319,7 @@
         "description": "An issue that the Chairs have determined has consensus, by canvassing the mailing list."
       }
     ],
-    "state": "open",
+    "state": "closed",
     "locked": false,
     "assignee": null,
     "assignees": [
@@ -7328,8 +7328,8 @@
     "milestone": null,
     "comments": 9,
     "created_at": "2019-11-17T04:39:42Z",
-    "updated_at": "2020-01-17T04:37:30Z",
-    "closed_at": null,
+    "updated_at": "2020-01-17T05:37:09Z",
+    "closed_at": "2020-01-17T05:37:09Z",
     "author_association": "CONTRIBUTOR",
     "body": "Gorry notes that we don't have a normative reference to 6928, but we could. The discussion there is largely independent of TCP, so I agree that we could do a normative reference to it.\r\n\r\nThis might be a design issue. It creates an exception to not having normative references to TCP documents. I think it's ok and may even be useful in this case."
   },