Script updating archive at 2022-04-07T00:08:05Z. [ci skip]

archive.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "magic": "E!vIA5L86J2I",
-  "timestamp": "2022-04-05T00:07:11.162128+00:00",
+  "timestamp": "2022-04-07T00:08:00.364102+00:00",
   "repo": "quicwg/base-drafts",
   "labels": [
     {
@@ -139957,6 +139957,33 @@
       "updatedAt": "2022-04-04T19:25:14Z",
       "closedAt": null,
       "comments": []
+    },
+    {
+      "number": 4984,
+      "id": "I_kwDOBGXJj85HPxh4",
+      "title": "STOP_SENDING to QPACK streams",
+      "url": "https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4984",
+      "state": "OPEN",
+      "author": "tatsuhiro-t",
+      "authorAssociation": "CONTRIBUTOR",
+      "assignees": [],
+      "labels": [
+        "editorial",
+        "-qpack"
+      ],
+      "body": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-quic-qpack-21#section-4.2\r\n\r\n>    These streams MUST NOT be closed.  Closure of either unidirectional\r\n   stream type MUST be treated as a connection error of type\r\n   H3_CLOSED_CRITICAL_STREAM.\r\n\r\nI'd like to clarify that whether this effectively says that receiver is not allowed to send STOP_SENDING.\r\nSTOP_SENDING is elicit RESET_STREAM that closes a stream.\r\n\r\n> An endpoint that receives a STOP_SENDING frame\r\n   MUST send a RESET_STREAM frame if the stream is in the \"Ready\" or\r\n   \"Send\" state. \r\n\r\nSTOP_SENDING itself does not close a stream, but it is an action to request a closure.\r\nI found in interop runner test, one implementation sends STOP_SENDING to QPACK streams.\r\nMy implementation sends RESET_STREAM when it is received as mandated by spec, and upon stream closure, the connection is closed because QPACK streams are closed, then the test fails.\r\n\r\nHTTP draft explicitly says that requesting closure for the control stream is prohibited:\r\n\r\n> The sender MUST NOT close the control stream, and the receiver MUST NOT\r\n   request that the sender close the control stream.\r\n\r\nIt would be nice to add the similar statement to QPACK streams.",
+      "createdAt": "2022-04-06T23:54:31Z",
+      "updatedAt": "2022-04-07T00:02:01Z",
+      "closedAt": null,
+      "comments": [
+        {
+          "author": "martinthomson",
+          "authorAssociation": "MEMBER",
+          "body": "It's super-late in the process, but maybe the editors can see a way to squeeze an editorial change in.",
+          "createdAt": "2022-04-07T00:02:01Z",
+          "updatedAt": "2022-04-07T00:02:01Z"
+        }
+      ]
     }
   ],
   "pulls": [
@@ -494612,6 +494639,35 @@
           ]
         }
       ]
+    },
+    {
+      "number": 4983,
+      "id": "PR_kwDOBGXJj841vg2E",
+      "title": "Merge singular and plural index entries",
+      "url": "https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4983",
+      "state": "OPEN",
+      "author": "MikeBishop",
+      "authorAssociation": "CONTRIBUTOR",
+      "assignees": [],
+      "labels": [
+        "editorial",
+        "-http"
+      ],
+      "body": "@cabo was helpful enough to show me how to do this in https://github.com/cabo/kramdown-rfc/issues/166, so now singular and plural versions of the same term are a single index entry.",
+      "createdAt": "2022-04-06T15:25:44Z",
+      "updatedAt": "2022-04-06T15:25:44Z",
+      "baseRepository": "quicwg/base-drafts",
+      "baseRefName": "h3qp_auth48",
+      "baseRefOid": "2bfb3d6a6bef63bebb65cef5d9015fc73dedea2d",
+      "headRepository": "quicwg/base-drafts",
+      "headRefName": "http/dedupe_index",
+      "headRefOid": "79e2ed7ba5e39d47206b6d0649ee53accc7d540f",
+      "closedAt": null,
+      "mergedAt": null,
+      "mergedBy": null,
+      "mergeCommit": null,
+      "comments": [],
+      "reviews": []
     }
   ]
 }