Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Revert dependency on unmerged kramdown-rfc2629 change
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
martinthomson committed Apr 30, 2021
1 parent aff23a5 commit 47235b5
Showing 1 changed file with 10 additions and 10 deletions.
20 changes: 10 additions & 10 deletions draft-ietf-quic-transport.md
Expand Up @@ -2576,16 +2576,16 @@ estimation for the new path.

On confirming a peer's ownership of its new address, an endpoint MUST
immediately reset the congestion controller and round-trip time estimator for
the new path to initial values (see {{Appendices A.3 and B.3 of QUIC-RECOVERY}})
unless the only change in the peer's address is its port number. Because
port-only changes are commonly the result of NAT rebinding or other middlebox
activity, the endpoint MAY instead retain its congestion control state and
round-trip estimate in those cases instead of reverting to initial values. In
cases where congestion control state retained from an old path is used on a new
path with substantially different characteristics, a sender could transmit too
aggressively until the congestion controller and the RTT estimator have
adapted. Generally, implementations are advised to be cautious when using
previous values on a new path.
the new path to initial values (see Appendices {{A.3<QUIC-RECOVERY}} and
{{B.3<QUIC-RECOVERY}} of {{QUIC-RECOVERY}}) unless the only change in the peer's
address is its port number. Because port-only changes are commonly the result
of NAT rebinding or other middlebox activity, the endpoint MAY instead retain
its congestion control state and round-trip estimate in those cases instead of
reverting to initial values. In cases where congestion control state retained
from an old path is used on a new path with substantially different
characteristics, a sender could transmit too aggressively until the congestion
controller and the RTT estimator have adapted. Generally, implementations are
advised to be cautious when using previous values on a new path.

There could be apparent reordering at the receiver when an endpoint sends data
and probes from/to multiple addresses during the migration period, since the two
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 47235b5

Please sign in to comment.