Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve discussion of unprotected packets and DoS #36

Closed
martinthomson opened this issue Nov 28, 2016 · 0 comments
Closed

Improve discussion of unprotected packets and DoS #36

martinthomson opened this issue Nov 28, 2016 · 0 comments
Labels
-tls editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus.

Comments

@martinthomson
Copy link
Member

The attacker needs to be on path to create a valid-looking unprotected packet.

Also, randomization doesn't help much if the attacker is on-path.

@martinthomson martinthomson added editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus. -tls labels Nov 28, 2016
martinthomson pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 25, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
-tls editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant