Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Is SCID omitted in Retry Pseudo-Packet since draft tls-29 ? #4094

Closed
Lingtaonju opened this issue Sep 14, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #4095
Closed

Is SCID omitted in Retry Pseudo-Packet since draft tls-29 ? #4094

Lingtaonju opened this issue Sep 14, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #4095
Labels
-tls editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus.
Projects
Late Stage Processing

Comments

@Lingtaonju
Copy link

As stated in the title, I wander whether this is a typo or there is some reason to omit scid?

image
@Lingtaonju Lingtaonju changed the title SCID is omitted in Retry Pseudo-Packet since draft tls-29 ? Is SCID omitted in Retry Pseudo-Packet since draft tls-29 ? Sep 14, 2020
@martinthomson
Copy link
Member

Thanks for catching this. It's an omission. We had a similar error in other drafts, that was fixed, but copy-paste makes errors live longer than you might like.

@martinthomson martinthomson added -tls editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus. labels Sep 14, 2020
martinthomson added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 14, 2020
@martinthomson
Restore missing field
e8bb46b 
This was a copy-paste error that it seems we never fixed.

Closes #4094.
@martinthomson martinthomson mentioned this issue Sep 14, 2020
Merged
@larseggert larseggert added this to Triage in Late Stage Processing via automation Sep 14, 2020
Late Stage Processing automation moved this from Triage to Issue Handled Sep 14, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
-tls editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus.
Projects
Late Stage Processing
  
Issue Handled
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Restore missing field quicwg/base-drafts
3 participants
@martinthomson @larseggert @Lingtaonju