Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rewording suggestion #4119

Closed
larseggert opened this issue Sep 22, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #4159
Closed

Rewording suggestion #4119

larseggert opened this issue Sep 22, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #4159
Labels
-invariants editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus.

Comments

@larseggert
Copy link
Member

Issue raised by @gorryfair via email:

(ii) Does this read better with /for/ moved within the sentence?
OLD:/At the endpoint, the connection ID is used to identify which QUIC connection the packet is intended for./
NEW:/At the endpoint, the connection ID is used to identify the QUIC connection for which the packet is intended./

@larseggert larseggert added this to Triage in Late Stage Processing via automation Sep 22, 2020
@martinthomson martinthomson added the editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus. label Sep 22, 2020
@project-bot project-bot bot moved this from Triage to Editorial Issues in Late Stage Processing Sep 22, 2020
@martinthomson
Copy link
Member

Sounds good. I'll do that too.

martinthomson added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 24, 2020
Late Stage Processing automation moved this from Editorial Issues to Issue Handled Sep 24, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
-invariants editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus.
Projects
Late Stage Processing
  
Issue Handled
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants