Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ben Kaduk's TLS Comment 26 #4502

Closed
LPardue opened this issue Jan 6, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

Ben Kaduk's TLS Comment 26 #4502

LPardue opened this issue Jan 6, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
-tls editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus. iesg An issue raised during IESG review.
Milestone

Comments

@LPardue
Copy link
Member

LPardue commented Jan 6, 2021

@kaduk said:

Section 9.6

The initial secrets use a key that is specific to the negotiated QUIC
version. New QUIC versions SHOULD define a new salt value used in
calculating initial secrets.

Also for the Retry Integrity Tag key/nonce secret?

@LPardue LPardue added -tls iesg An issue raised during IESG review. labels Jan 6, 2021
@LPardue LPardue added this to the tls-iesg milestone Jan 6, 2021
@martinthomson
Copy link
Member

That does not have the same impetus, so I think that it is reasonable to omit it. Updating the keys would be OK and I would expect it to happen, but it is not necessary to the extent that it needs to be called out.

@martinthomson martinthomson added the editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus. label Jan 6, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
-tls editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus. iesg An issue raised during IESG review.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants